A cartoon by Mike Luckovich. Related | Trump's incompetent DOJ makes a mess of latest Epstein files drop

Congressional Cowards is a weekly series highlighting the worst Donald Trump defenders on Capitol Hill, who refuse to criticize him—no matter how disgraceful or lawless his actions. President Donald Trump announced on Monday that he thinks that the federal government should take over the 2026 midterm elections—an obvious effort to rig the results in favor of Republicans to prevent Democrats from flipping control of Congress. An FBI press office person approaches the Fulton County Election Hub and Operation Center in Georgia on Jan. 28. «These people were brought to our country to vote, and they vote illegally. The Republicans should say, we should take over the voting in at least 15 places. The Republicans ought to nationalize the voting,» Trump told Dan Bongino, the loser podcaster who quit his job at the FBI. «We have states that I won that show I didn't win. You're gonna see something in Georgia.» But rather than condemn the obviously illegal and dangerous threat, Republicans have been gaslighting Americans into thinking that Trump didn't mean what he said and is actually just talking about the need to pass their voter suppression SAVE Act, which would require proof of citizenship when registering to vote. Take a look at what Senate Majority Leader John Thune said when asked whether he agreed with Trump's horrific demand to «nationalize» elections. «I think the president has clarified what he meant by that, and that is that he supports the SAVE Act,» Thune said Tuesday—an obviously false statement as Trump explicitly said that he wants the federal government to take over elections. xQ: Do you agree with Trump saying we should 'nationalize' elections? THUNE: I think the president has clarified what he meant by that, and that is that he supports the SAVE Act (That is not what he meant)— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2026-02-03T19:52:16.346Z Similarly, Sen. Jon Husted of Ohio was also asked if he agrees that the federal government should take over elections, and gave a mealy-mouthed response that did not answer the question. «I understand the president's frustration,» Husted said on CNN. «We can instill confidence in both the president and American people that elections are run well through the SAVE Act.» And when host Dana Bash pushed further, Husted demurred. «I don't know exactly what he means,» Husted said.  Yeah, sure bud. xBASH: Do you agree the state is 'an agent for the federal govt' in elections? HUSTED: I understand the president's frustration. We can instill confidence that elections are run well through the SAVE Act B: He wasn't talking about the SAVE Act, though HUSTED: I don't know exactly what he means— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2026-02-04T18:05:14.622Z Meanwhile, Coward of the Year House Speaker Mike Johnson spread voter fraud lies to defend Trump's call to take over elections—something the former constitutional lawyer should know is illegal.  Related | Why Trump's raid on Georgia election site is so chilling Article I Section 4 of the Constitution explicitly states that, “The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof.”  So Congress can make laws regulating elections, but they cannot run them—as Trump is demanding. «We had three Republican candidates who were ahead on election day in the last cycle, and every time a new tranche of ballots came in they just magically whittled away until their leads were lost. It looks on its face to be fraudulent,» Johnson told reporters on Tuesday. «Can I prove that? No.» xJohnson: “We had three House Republican candidates who were ahead on Election Day…And every time a new tranche of ballots came in, they just magically whittled away until their leads were lost…It looks on its face to be fraudulent. Can I prove that? No.”— The Bulwark (@thebulwark.com) 2026-02-03T20:17:21.200Z Of course, the order in which ballots are counted means nothing. Trump then made all of the GOP defenders look like idiots a day later, when he again said that, yes, he really did mean that the federal government should take over elections because of some nonexistent fraud he now has Director of National Intelligence Tulsia Gabbard probing. A cartoon by Clay Jones. «Take a look at Detroit … take a look at Philadelphia, take a look at Atlanta,» Trump said Thursday. «The federal government should not allow that. The federal government should get involved. These are agents of the federal government to count the vote. If they can’t count the vote legally and honestly, then somebody else should take over.» Indeed, Trump has already tried to take over election administration with executive orders that sought to require people to show proof of citizenship when registering to vote, limiting the use of electronic ballot-counting machines, and blocking states from counting mail-in ballots that were postmarked on Election Day.  But federal judges have blocked the orders, saying that Trump cannot unilaterally change election law. Republicans, who purport to be supporters of states’ rights, should be appalled at Trump's call to federalize elections. But because they’re all sniveling cowards, they’ve instead found any way possible to defend Dear Leader.

Some election leaders are preparing for the possibility of federal pressure. By Jonathan Shorman for Stateline President Donald Trump’s calls this week to “nationalize” elections capped a year of efforts by his administration to exercise authority over state-run elections. The demands now have some state and local election officials fearing — and preparing for — a tumultuous year ahead. “I don’t think we can put anything past this administration,” Oregon Democratic Secretary of State Tobias Read told Stateline in an interview. “I think they’re increasingly desperate, increasingly scared about what’s going to happen when they are held accountable by American voters. So we have to be prepared for everything.” Ever since Trump signed an executive order last March that attempted to impose a requirement that voters prove their citizenship in federal elections, the federal government has engaged in a wide-ranging effort to influence how elections are run. Under the U.S. Constitution, that responsibility belongs to the states. Then came Trump’s remarks on a podcast Monday that Republicans should nationalize elections and take over voting in at least 15 places, though he didn’t specify where. In the Oval Office the next day, the president reaffirmed his view that states are “agents” of the federal government in elections. “I don’t know why the federal government doesn’t do them anyway,” Trump told reporters on Tuesday, despite the Constitution’s clear delegation of that job to states. Related | Election officials draw on sobering 2020 lessons as Trump calls for nationalizing voting Across the country, election officials are watching recent developments and, in some instances, grappling with how the Trump administration’s moves could affect their preparations for November’s midterm elections, which will determine control of Congress. Local election officials say they are considering how they would respond to the presence of federal law enforcement near polling places and what steps they need to take to ensure voting proceeds smoothly. Several Democratic election officials, and some Republicans, have spoken out. Placing voting under control of the federal government would represent a fundamental violation of the Constitution, they note. The U.S. Constitution authorizes states to set the time, place and manner of elections for Congress but also allows Congress to change those regulations. The elections themselves are run by the states. “Oh, hell no,” Maine Democratic Secretary of State Shenna Bellows said in a video statement posted to social media about federalizing elections. Bellows, who is running for governor, said she would mail the White House a pocket Constitution, “because it seems they’ve lost their copy.” The U.S. Department of Justice already has sued 24 states and the District of Columbia to obtain unredacted voter rolls that include sensitive personal information that it says is needed to search for noncitizen voters. The Department of Homeland Security wants states to run their voter rolls through a powerful citizenship verification tool. Those opposed to the demand say sharing the data risks the privacy of millions of voters. Many fear the administration could use the information to disqualify eligible voters, challenge the legitimacy of a victory in a closely contested midterm election, or use the information to target political enemies. In recent weeks, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi linked the presence of federal immigration agents in Minneapolis in part to Minnesota’s refusal to turn over its voter rolls. And the FBI seized ballots from an elections warehouse Fulton County, Georgia — a state that was a central focus of Trump’s push to overturn his 2020 election loss. Related | Why Trump's raid on Georgia election site is so chilling “I think it does affect our planning as far as, what if there is some sort of federal law enforcement presence on Election Day or before or after? So that definitely factors into our planning,” said Scott McDonell, the Democratic clerk in Dane County, Wisconsin, which includes Madison. Ingham County, Michigan, Clerk Barb Byrum, a Democrat running for secretary of state, said she and other election administrators conduct tabletop exercises and keep emergency plans for numerous scenarios. Those used to focus on floods, power outages and cyberattacks. “Now, unfortunately, it’s turning into the president of the United States meddling in elections,” Byrum said. “We will be prepared. Voters will hopefully not see anything different at their polling locations. … But we need to be diligent.” Pamela Smith, president and CEO of the election security nonprofit Verified Voting, said election officials and their lawyers need to study up on laws and regulations, including chain-of-custody requirements for ballots. David Becker, director of the nonpartisan Center for Election Innovation & Research, which operates the Election Official Legal Defense Network, said more than 10,000 lawyers have been recruited who are ready to provide pro bono legal assistance or advice to election officials. When Stateline asked Read whether he anticipates Oregon facing federal pressure over its voter rolls, the secretary of state said he was set to meet this week with county clerks in the Portland metro area “to talk about that very question.” Read’s office later confirmed the meeting took place. Oregon’s largest city, Portland, has been a focus of the Trump administration. Last year, Trump deployed federalized Oregon National Guard members to the city after protests outside an Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility. And federal agents last month shot two people in a hospital parking lot. Portland is a self-described sanctuary city that does not aid the federal government in immigration enforcement. A protester in a frog costume stands in front of federal law enforcement officers outside an ICE facility in Portland, Ore., in Oct. 2025. The concern in Oregon comes after Bondi on Jan. 24 sent a letter to Minnesota Democratic Gov. Tim Walz after federal agents killed Renee Good and Alex Pretti in separate shootings in Minneapolis that were captured on video. Bondi’s letter outlined three “common sense solutions” that would help end the “chaos” in Minnesota, she wrote. One of those solutions called for the state to provide the Justice Department with its full, unredacted voter rolls. Minnesota Democratic Secretary of State Steve Simon has called Bondi’s letter an “outrageous attempt to coerce Minnesota” into handing over the data. Simon hasn’t provided the voter list, but White House border czar Tom Homan is pulling 700 immigration agents from Minnesota amid outrage over their presence. Roughly 2,300 agents will remain in the state. In North Carolina, Durham County Director of Elections Derek Bowens called Trump’s rhetoric and recent federal actions concerning. Bowens, a nonpartisan official appointed by the Durham County Board of Elections, said that as long as the rule of law persists, a “constitutional guard” will protect election administration. Still, Bowens, who oversees elections in a largely Democratic area in a presidential swing state, said he and other local officials are preparing to prevent potential “intrusion” into the process. “I’m not at liberty to divulge what that would be in terms of security protocols, but that’s definitely in the forefronts of our minds,” Bowens said in an interview, adding that he would be working with local emergency services officials “to make sure we’re positioned to ensure everyone that is eligible has unfettered access to the ballot box.” Trump wants federal control Trump appears to be crossing a line from urging Congress to set additional election requirements into wanting the federal government’s hands on states’ election administration infrastructure, said Barry Burden, a professor of political science at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and the director of the Elections Research Center at the university. “That would be brand new,” Burden said. After Trump called for nationalizing elections during Monday’s appearance on the podcast of Dan Bongino, a right-wing media personality who was previously a top FBI official, the White House said Tuesday that the president had been referring to legislation in Congress that would require individuals to show proof of citizenship to register to vote. The bill has passed the House but is stalled in the Senate. But Trump late Tuesday doubled down on his original comments during an unrelated bill-signing ceremony in the Oval Office. He suggested the federal government should take a role in vote counting. “The federal government should get involved,” Trump said. “These are agents of the federal government to count the votes. If they can’t count the votes legally and honestly, then somebody else should take over.” Related | FBI's search of Georgia election center is 'dangerous,' experts warn Even before Trump’s nationalization comments, Democratic state chief election officials and some Republicans had refused to turn over copies of voter rolls containing driver’s license numbers, date of birth and full or partial Social Security numbers after the Justice Department began demanding the data last spring. Federal judges in California and Oregon have ruled those states don’t have to provide the data; numerous other lawsuits against other states are ongoing. Missouri Secretary of State Denny Hoskins, a Trump-supporting Republican who campaigned for office on calls to hand-count ballots, told a Missouri House committee on Tuesday that he wouldn’t provide the state’s full voter list without a court order. He said his office had only shared a public version of the voter rolls; Missouri hasn’t been sued by the Justice Department. The Trump administration has previously confirmed it is sharing records with Homeland Security, which operates an online program that it uses to verify citizenship. The Justice Department has also offered some states a confidential agreement to search their voter lists. “Clean voter rolls and basic election safeguards are requisites for free, fair, and transparent elections,” Assistant U.S. Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon wrote in a statement to Stateline. “The DOJ Civil Rights Division has a statutory mandate to enforce our federal voting rights laws, and ensuring the voting public’s confidence in the integrity of our elections is a top priority of this administration.” But U.S. District Court Judge David O. Carter, a Clinton appointee, wrote in a Jan. 15 decision that the voter roll demands risk a chilling effect on Americans who may opt not to register to vote over concerns about how their information could be used. He dismissed the Justice Department’s lawsuit seeking California’s voter rolls. “The taking of democracy does not occur in one fell swoop; it is chipped away piece-by-piece until there is nothing left. The case before the Court is one of these cuts that imperils all Americans,” Carter wrote in a 33-page decision. Some Republicans oppose nationalization Amid Trump’s call for nationalizing elections, some Republican election officials have broken with the president even as they have avoided criticizing him directly. State control has long been a central tenant of conservatism, though Trump has challenged elements of Republican orthodoxy over the past decade. Hoskins, the Missouri secretary of state, told state lawmakers on Tuesday, “I personally don’t believe we should nationalize elections.” Georgia Republican Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger in a news release on Monday urged lawmakers to focus on strengthening state administration of elections. He said that was better than “moving to federalize a core function of state government.” Raffensperger, who is running for governor this year, was famously targeted by Trump following the 2020 election to overturn his loss in Georgia. In a phone call, Trump told Raffensperger he wanted to “find 11,780 votes” — the size of his loss in the state. Raffensperger refused to aid Trump. Five years later, Raffensperger now faces pressure from Georgia state lawmakers to provide the state’s unredacted voter list to the Justice Department. The Georgia Senate on Monday passed a resolution calling on the secretary of state to fully comply with the department’s request. Georgia Republican state Sen. Randy Robertson, the resolution’s lead sponsor, said during a state Senate committee hearing last month that federal law supersedes limits on data sharing in Georgia law. He didn’t respond to an interview request. In a statement to Stateline, Raffensperger said that state law is “very clear” that officials aren’t allowed to turn over the information. “I will always follow the law and the Constitution,” Raffensperger wrote. The Georgia Senate vote came less than a week after the FBI searched the Fulton County elections warehouse and seized ballots. Fulton County, which includes much of the Atlanta metro area, was where Trump was indicted on charges of conspiracy and racketeering related to his efforts to overturn the state’s 2020 presidential election. The case was dismissed last year. The Justice Department didn’t answer a question from Stateline about whether it plans to seek search warrants for other election offices. On Wednesday, Fulton County filed a motion in federal court demanding the return of the seized ballots and other materials, Fulton County Board of Commissioners Chair Robb Pitts, a Democrat, said at a news conference. The motion also asks for the unsealing of the affidavit used by the FBI to support its search warrant application. “We will fight using all resources against those who seek to take over our elections,” Pitts said. “Our Constitution itself is at stake in this fight.”

A cartoon by Clay Jones. Related | Trump's incompetent DOJ makes a mess of latest Epstein files drop

Survey Says is a weekly series rounding up the most important polling trends or data points you need to know about, plus a vibe check on a trend that’s driving politics or culture. President Donald Trump loves football, but football may no longer love him. One year ago, Trump became the first sitting president to attend the Super Bowl. He had just retaken the White House after winning the popular vote, and he held a net-positive approval rating. And seemingly as a tribute to his bigotry, the NFL painted over the words “End Racism” in its end zones, replacing it with the vague and benign “Choose Love.” He likely went to the game expecting to be cheered.  This year, though, Trump won’t attend. If you ask him, it’s because the game, which will be hosted in California, is “just too far away.” That’s a particularly funny thing to say for a man with Air Force One at his disposal. Nevertheless, he wants you to know that it has nothing, nothing at all, to do with his now-dismal approval rating. No, much the opposite, he claims.  “I’ve [gotten] great hands [at] the Super Bowl. They like me,” he told the New York Post last month. But if Trump believed that, he would be there. The real reason he won’t attend is that he, perhaps more than any previous president, grasps the political power of football in America—and he now sees that it could be used against him. In the U.S., no sport attracts more of the public’s love than football. Last summer, Quinnipiac University found that not only do 29% of Americans call football their personal favorite sport, but also an overwhelming majority (74%) recognize it as “America’s sport.” x Datawrapper Content More relevant to this year’s midterm elections, nearly 7 in 10 likely voters are fans of the NFL, according to a new poll from Echelon Insights. That’s far more than the second-most popular sport, baseball, which 47% are fans of. And 56% of Americans say they’ll definitely or probably watch the Super Bowl this year, per YouGov. Trump is attuned to these facts. When endorsing political candidates or even nominating judges, he is sure to mention whether the person played or coached football, no matter if it was in college or the NFL. He’s even taken the unusual step of lobbying for Washington, D.C., to host the 2027 NFL Draft. You have to wonder if that’s one reason he flooded the city with troops last year, signaling to the locals what he may do if they try to protest the big televised event. Trump’s social media feeds are filled with football, too. He’s posted demands that teams bring back their formerly racist names. And during this January alone, he’s spoken out on team staffing decisions, Hall of Fame ballots, and the NFL’s new “sissy” kickoff rules. To him, the previous rule was “Big Time, Strong, Glamorous, and Exciting,” no matter that the new rule has more than doubled the number of regular-season kickoff returns, which sagged to an all-time low during the 2023 season. In fact, while in office, Trump’s personal and governmental social media accounts have mentioned “football” or “NFL” in 161 posts on X and Truth Social, according to a Daily Kos analysis. That far outpaces former Presidents Barack Obama (26) and Joe Biden (15). x Datawrapper Content Some of that may derive from the fact that Trump is both a windbag and a football fan. It’s not hard to find him posting online about the poor showings of his hometown teams, the New York Jets and the Giants. Instead, he seems to prefer the New England Patriots, regularly congratulating them on social media, praising their performance, and wishing them good luck. He’s close with former quarterback Tom Brady and team owner Robert Kraft, so maybe his fandom is based on personal ties. Or maybe it’s because they’ve won a lot of Super Bowls (unlike, say, the Jets). It’s hard to know how much of Trump’s football focus is due to his own fandom or to a strategy to reach less engaged voters, like the one he employed when he made the rounds on “bro” podcasts ahead of the 2024 election. It’s probably both. Then-President Barack Obama throws a football at Soldier Field following the NATO working dinner in Chicago in May 2012. Forgive this comparison, but like Trump, Obama understood the special power of football. He was not shy about his love for the Chicago Bears, even welcoming the 1985 team to the White House in 2011 and declaring them “the greatest team in NFL history.” Even now, Obama will pop up on ESPN to cheer on Da Bears. Last month, the Obama Foundation posted an old photo on Facebook of him throwing a football and jokingly offered him up to quarterback the team. Sports fandom, among many other things, made him likable and relatable.  That’s why Obama always agreed to the Super Bowl’s traditional pregame interview. It gave him a platform to reach a very large and less politically engaged America. It’s also probably why Trump brought the interview back in 2025, after Biden skipped it two years in a row, despite the fact that the interviews are usually softballs—or should I say deflated balls? In fact, Biden dodging those two interviews presaged what would come later in 2024, at that catastrophic presidential debate, where he made repeated gaffes and struggled to complete his thoughts. In a given year, the Super Bowl brings in more viewers than any other single TV event, and it seems Biden—or at least his team—was afraid of that. After all, his number of public events greatly declined toward the end of his presidency.  x Datawrapper Content But when it comes to politics, the most meaningful aspect of this year’s Super Bowl may not be that Trump will avoid the stadium and the boos. It’s that the NFL itself is starting to create separation from him.  This past September, the league and its partners announced that Puerto Rican megastar Bad Bunny would perform at the 2026 Super Bowl halftime show, sparking backlash from the right. Not only did conservatives not want to suffer the immeasurable pain of hearing a person sing in Spanish, but also Bad Bunny, whose real name is Benito Antonio Martínez Ocasio, stands fervently opposed to Trump’s immigration agenda. The artist mocked Trump in a music video last summer, and he went as far as to avoid performing in the U.S. out of a fear of federal agents harassing his fans. And yet, despite this right-wing backlash, the NFL held firm. Bad Bunny, who will perform at the Super Bowl LX Halftime Show, departs after a news conference on Feb. 5. In October, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell said, «[Bady Bunny is] one of the most popular entertainers in the world. ... I think it's going to be exciting and a united moment.» And later that month, the league’s chief marketing officer added, “Not everyone has to like everything we do. Bad Bunny is fucking awesome.” Even individual teams have backed El Conejo Malo. In November, Charlotte Jones, who is the ​​Dallas Cowboys chief brand officer and whose father owns the team, told a podcast that having Bad Bunny perform would be “awesome.” “We have a mixed culture and our whole society is based on immigrants who have come here and founded our country, and I think we can celebrate that,” she said. Quite the turn from just a year ago, when the NFL scrubbed “End Racism” off its fields in deference to Trump. And all of those above statements came before Trump’s federal agents killed two Americans in Minnesota in January, sparking protests across the country.  In fact, one day after federal immigration agents killed intensive-care nurse Alex Pretti, Trump took to social media to post about the NFL’s new kickoff rules. “I can’t watch the new NFL Kickoff. Like many others, I just turn my head. Who has the right to make such a change? So disparaging to the game!” he wrote to a nation that had just witnessed its second needless execution in a handful of weeks. Trump wasn’t reading the room then, but he seems to be reading it now—and he’s not liking what it’s telling him. Any updates? Democratic governors have been a brake on the Trump administration, and there’s some good news for two high-profile candidates this year: New polls show Sen. Amy Klobuchar with double-digit leads over her Republican rivals in Minnesota, and New York Gov. Kathy Hochul with a 26-percentage-point lead over the expected Republican candidate, Bruce Blakeman. Vibe check Another reason Trump might want to avoid the Super Bowl is that one of the teams has the most liberal fanbase in the NFL. Forty-three percent of Democrats have a “very favorable” view of the Seattle Seahawks, more than any other team, according to data that Morning Consult released in 2020. Only 27% of Republicans are Seahawks fans. That puts the partisan difference at a sizable 16 points. The wild thing is, all but one team—the Tennessee Titans—has a fandom that leans left. It also could be that liberals just like a wider swath of teams than Republicans do. Or some mix of both. x Datawrapper Content

Honoring Italy’s history of classical music was a whimsical turn in showcase of centuries of cultural arts heritage

Sales rise 87.50% to Rs 0.75 crore

Reported sales nil

Sales rise 46.43% to Rs 176.81 crore

Sales decline 43.33% to Rs 8.45 crore

Sales rise 20.78% to Rs 210.21 crore

Onward and upward for their next adventure.

Physicists saw excitons, a type of quasiparticle, undergo a reversible phase transition from superfluid to supersolid for the first time, opening new doors for studying extreme states of matter.

A study in Iceland found that microbes are hoarding more nitrogen for themselves, altering nutrient cycling and leaving less for plants.

Emerging evidence suggests that «night owls» are more likely to have poor heart health and a higher risk of heart attack or stroke than «morning larks.» Why is that?

Archaeological remains on the Kitsissut islands off the coast of Greenland reveal that whole communities regularly journeyed across the dangerous Arctic waters.

Among the sandals discovered in Tut's tomb is a pair whose insoles were decorated with images of the boy king's enemies.

The boreal forest—the world’s largest terrestrial biome—is warming faster than any other forest type. New research uses Landsat data to track how the forests shift.

Close-up Photographer of the Year announces the winner of its 7th edition. Do stories and artists like this matter to you? Become a Colossal Member today and support independent arts publishing for as little as $7 per month. The article The Forest-Like Interior of Coral Takes the Grand Prize in the CUPOTY 7 Photo Contest appeared first on Colossal.

Martin Wittfooth's enigmatic painting meld flora and fauna to consider interconnection and nature's endurance. Do stories and artists like this matter to you? Become a Colossal Member today and support independent arts publishing for as little as $7 per month. The article Through Vivid Color, Martin Wittfooth Revels in Surreal Worlds appeared first on Colossal.

85-year-old actor Ian McKellen let his hair and beard grow out to play the ionic role of Shakespeare’s Falstaff — after the final performance, he finally stepped out of character and back to himself.

In this LensCulture interview, Torrance York reflects on how photography became a tool for understanding, acceptance, and connection after her Parkinson’s diagnosis.

The scale of that whale! Do stories and artists like this matter to you? Become a Colossal Member today and support independent arts publishing for as little as $7 per month. The article Bruno Pontiroli Tests the Boundaries of Familiarity in His Uncanny Wildlife Paintings appeared first on Colossal.

«A photograph is only a small piece in the jigsaw that makes up the big picture, but sometimes it is these small pieces that open our eyes.» Do stories and artists like this matter to you? Become a Colossal Member today and support independent arts publishing for as little as $7 per month. The article ‘Where the World is Melting’ Documents Communities Amid Indelible Changes in the Arctic appeared first on Colossal.

FOX Sports' Casey Jacobsen shares his latest men's college hoops rankings with several big moves this week.

The Seahawks won Super Bowl LX in dominant fashion. Here are some facts and stats that define their victory over the Patriots.

Klint Kubiak officially announced his plans to become the Las Vegas Raiders' next head coach.

The Patriots may have been crushed in Super Bowl LX, but with Drake Maye and Mike Vrabel, they've got the ingredients for many more Super runs.

Breaking down the biggest talking points from the Seahawks' dominant win versus the Patriots in Super Bowl LX.

Former Formula 1 driver and Sky Sports analyst Martin Brundle believes Ayrton Senna and Michael Schumacher would have enjoyed racing the new regulation F1 cars.The upcoming 2026 season welcomes a new set of regulations into the championship. Some of the changes include an almost 50:50 split between internal combustion and electric power. As a result, there will be a greater emphasis on energy ...Keep reading